You are the transcendant the aether element the 5th element. 1h:25min mark, adam has lasso'd the same idea as me
|
wow/./.
wow
so i ate nothing all day felt great, just interacted with a low vibrational being.. suddenly hungry..
was buzzing on one lemon.. then this asian and their crew came and.. asked me something i had to come lower to understand her and then when her crew busted in.. completely distracted...growl in the stomach now .. been taken out of my element of aether.. ~benjamin couwenberg
(which makes me think theres a connection to the light body or soulmind or something)
you are piezoelectric and it is your soul... there are many keys to life but only one of those keys controls all the others and it is piezoelectric and i have facts... add me and learn...
?
Piezoelectric aka your soul. It is what holds you together and runs you… Leave a reply First off you made of almost all the elements that have been found on earth… Static can control these elements…
Water http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhWQ-r1LYXY
Fire and wind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7_8Gc_Llr8
Earth at 53sec. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvspL4kMY54
Your atoms are the star in the jar since static makes vibrations and sound at the right frequency and energy to form you… so static is the key to life since it controls all elements in you… It is the 99% empty fabric of space… Star in a jar. http://www.wimp.com/collapsebubble/
~http://pharaohsdidit.wordpress.com/
?
Piezoelectric aka your soul. It is what holds you together and runs you… Leave a reply First off you made of almost all the elements that have been found on earth… Static can control these elements…
Water http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhWQ-r1LYXY
Fire and wind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7_8Gc_Llr8
Earth at 53sec. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvspL4kMY54
Your atoms are the star in the jar since static makes vibrations and sound at the right frequency and energy to form you… so static is the key to life since it controls all elements in you… It is the 99% empty fabric of space… Star in a jar. http://www.wimp.com/collapsebubble/
~http://pharaohsdidit.wordpress.com/
|
reload- surf matrices of in-phi-knit-e(nergy)
*When i talk of dimensions (this goes for anywhere in consciousazine productions) i do not talk of the same as the conventionals do, with this 1 dimension is a straight line then 2 dimensions up down through it then sideways 3 dimensions then 4th dimension some kind of hyperdimension. I talk of the real meta dimensionality constructs of our reality this universal undertaking (of which it appears several theories exist, either 9 12 16 or more/infinite dimensions, however it has become obvious to me that these are all different dimensional theories each describing reality with different aspectuals and hence come to different meta dimension totals, they talk of say maybe the 9 dimensional theory talks of 9 time dimensionality, the 12 dimensional meta theory seems to talk of or incorporate dimensions of orchestrational value, the 16 dimensional theory is like perhaps always seeming to be to me like my friend bradely ludes work; and mathematical, then infinite dimensional theory seems to be to me atleast just using the word dimension as a not a dimensional property but rather a whole different like place of existence "parallel dimensions". When i say dimensions like 6th dimensional sacred geometrical archetypy i refer to the 9 or 12 dimensional model (at least i mean to); things like gold ring series on youtube is where i got that from and then youknow added my own reality to it things i see read experience to try attempt validity.
When i say dimension i do not use the conventional pragmatic definition ever- 'A measure of spatial extent, especially width, height, or length'. OR i use the dimensional meaning of a dimension as some kind of other characteristicible domain or a dimension as in different degree(s) of freedom.
When i say dimension i do not use the conventional pragmatic definition ever- 'A measure of spatial extent, especially width, height, or length'. OR i use the dimensional meaning of a dimension as some kind of other characteristicible domain or a dimension as in different degree(s) of freedom.
http://www.technocrates.org/myster-solved-about-the-fundamental-nature-of-light/
the blue light of earth ? u want me to teach u ? Ben Couwenberg u sit and pulse in it, mantak chia or dowism knows about it, they r the real Christ jedi. after u do microcosmic orbit up back and down frontal functional channel of spine, u sit and pulse in light colour blue light, from the ey feel a pulse and the crown will be pulsing the hands and feet and heart eyes.
what exactly is magnus opus?
Ben Couwenberg
mm
what is alchemical gold?
wink emoticon
well think about how I said what I said
iv also referred to it as magnus ops asif u can take pieces of something that is like a pool of intellectual property u have behind inside u somewhere your magnus opus and take pieces of it and put it in quotes for others to use, like pieces of magnus op.
it feels like some thing to do with your soul work. why u r here, which is not just to work at mcdonalds if u know what im saying. we r trying to build light into stuff, magnus opus has a thick energy in vision it looks like a dark pool.
magnus opus is some kind of thing though, the mission more referred to as great work(why your here your mission she replied).
The actual magnus opus seems to be something u channel and focus, into great works.
but feel notice the name? it feels like a thing. magnus opus.. maybe a cousin of the philosphers stone? which I feel itself may just be the logic mind of earth.
yes my name is Benjamin Couwenberg and I am a gnostic knower. feel it children of the dawn u must not listen to the dark storm.
'great work' is also known as magnus opus, but i think thats because when u great work what your pulling from is your magnus opus which has some sort of soul connotativeness about it. you are said by me, to "focus pocus your magnus opus".
It is asif magnus opus has substance, which becomes real form in 3rd dimensionality and frozen cosmicality the 2nd dimensionality of variety and contrast the building blocks of hard dense electron valancy.
"Magnus Opus the pool; It looks lika glittery dark pool with sparse red sparkles and i think i see maybe medium dark blue sparkles also...and green possibly more colours pink, twinkling in the dark pool asif , asif an ebullient spark or piece of the cosmogonical puzzle. When I explore one of these sparks it opens up into something too, a bit similar to a self dribbling jewelled basketball out of Terrence mckenian hyperspace, lol im joking, kinda, appears that way on its algorithmic surface, but I can dive into it, and it appears to be either its own universe or its own world of some sort."~Benjamin couwenberg
now, that was all before, I have studied or read anything about it, apart from reading 'great work' on Wikipedia which stated the great work used to be said by the? I think romans and that, to be ending in purpling... which wreaks of synonymy with the esoteric (deep) meanings of gnomenclature ; indigo. Purpling, indigo..
the blue light of earth ? u want me to teach u ? Ben Couwenberg u sit and pulse in it, mantak chia or dowism knows about it, they r the real Christ jedi. after u do microcosmic orbit up back and down frontal functional channel of spine, u sit and pulse in light colour blue light, from the ey feel a pulse and the crown will be pulsing the hands and feet and heart eyes.
what exactly is magnus opus?
Ben Couwenberg
mm
what is alchemical gold?
wink emoticon
well think about how I said what I said
iv also referred to it as magnus ops asif u can take pieces of something that is like a pool of intellectual property u have behind inside u somewhere your magnus opus and take pieces of it and put it in quotes for others to use, like pieces of magnus op.
it feels like some thing to do with your soul work. why u r here, which is not just to work at mcdonalds if u know what im saying. we r trying to build light into stuff, magnus opus has a thick energy in vision it looks like a dark pool.
magnus opus is some kind of thing though, the mission more referred to as great work(why your here your mission she replied).
The actual magnus opus seems to be something u channel and focus, into great works.
but feel notice the name? it feels like a thing. magnus opus.. maybe a cousin of the philosphers stone? which I feel itself may just be the logic mind of earth.
yes my name is Benjamin Couwenberg and I am a gnostic knower. feel it children of the dawn u must not listen to the dark storm.
'great work' is also known as magnus opus, but i think thats because when u great work what your pulling from is your magnus opus which has some sort of soul connotativeness about it. you are said by me, to "focus pocus your magnus opus".
It is asif magnus opus has substance, which becomes real form in 3rd dimensionality and frozen cosmicality the 2nd dimensionality of variety and contrast the building blocks of hard dense electron valancy.
"Magnus Opus the pool; It looks lika glittery dark pool with sparse red sparkles and i think i see maybe medium dark blue sparkles also...and green possibly more colours pink, twinkling in the dark pool asif , asif an ebullient spark or piece of the cosmogonical puzzle. When I explore one of these sparks it opens up into something too, a bit similar to a self dribbling jewelled basketball out of Terrence mckenian hyperspace, lol im joking, kinda, appears that way on its algorithmic surface, but I can dive into it, and it appears to be either its own universe or its own world of some sort."~Benjamin couwenberg
now, that was all before, I have studied or read anything about it, apart from reading 'great work' on Wikipedia which stated the great work used to be said by the? I think romans and that, to be ending in purpling... which wreaks of synonymy with the esoteric (deep) meanings of gnomenclature ; indigo. Purpling, indigo..
|
|
Lets discuss "Aether" "Ether" "Eather" "White light"
."Aether" the intangible..
The problem of Qualia
(dualism; physical/pragmatic/corporeal/tangibility,phenomical V
non-physical/incorporeal/intangible/symbolic/neunomical)....
Here is a great reading to the "aether side" :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714925/Walter-Russell-The-Secret-of-Light
Is the white light the aether? or are all the higher dimensions aetheral? (Will discuss these two questions in latter sections)
Clearly on the other side; all is physical with the non dual perspective, neuroscience is playing the act of foothold amongst spurious materialists*. (Will discuss in neuro section)
(*Yes i am a "dualist" according to some (even though im not) as you can tell from me saying spurious infront of materialist. however i think it is not dual just at this point in "evolution" or "time" not pragmaticly detectable and accuratly measurable to us! which does not make things like planck length, aether or neutrinos or anything else not real; however it means these things are remaining untill lite up and measured so to speak, spiritual, intangible, "may not be real" "only theory" in the eyes of organic portals/spurious materialists. See i dont think dualism is, i think things that have not been detected is. I have "proof " to enhance my statement and will show that in a subsequent section1.
Let it be clear that since not detected the question still remains what is it then how real is it and why is it- which does not conclude! materialism is the theory of existance, just because thats measured. The universe is big and old, in a thousand years, perhaps we figure out how to measure this hitherto nuenomical intangible non-"stuff" / "theory" "speculation" "concept" of "aether".
could aether be the ultimate anisotropic 'force' or 'nature' ? having ultimate potential and so henceforth not isotropic- uniformity in all orientations. or the ultimate isotropic force?
The problem of Qualia
(dualism; physical/pragmatic/corporeal/tangibility,phenomical V
non-physical/incorporeal/intangible/symbolic/neunomical)....
Here is a great reading to the "aether side" :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714925/Walter-Russell-The-Secret-of-Light
Is the white light the aether? or are all the higher dimensions aetheral? (Will discuss these two questions in latter sections)
Clearly on the other side; all is physical with the non dual perspective, neuroscience is playing the act of foothold amongst spurious materialists*. (Will discuss in neuro section)
(*Yes i am a "dualist" according to some (even though im not) as you can tell from me saying spurious infront of materialist. however i think it is not dual just at this point in "evolution" or "time" not pragmaticly detectable and accuratly measurable to us! which does not make things like planck length, aether or neutrinos or anything else not real; however it means these things are remaining untill lite up and measured so to speak, spiritual, intangible, "may not be real" "only theory" in the eyes of organic portals/spurious materialists. See i dont think dualism is, i think things that have not been detected is. I have "proof " to enhance my statement and will show that in a subsequent section1.
Let it be clear that since not detected the question still remains what is it then how real is it and why is it- which does not conclude! materialism is the theory of existance, just because thats measured. The universe is big and old, in a thousand years, perhaps we figure out how to measure this hitherto nuenomical intangible non-"stuff" / "theory" "speculation" "concept" of "aether".
could aether be the ultimate anisotropic 'force' or 'nature' ? having ultimate potential and so henceforth not isotropic- uniformity in all orientations. or the ultimate isotropic force?
<Da vinci's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man
Showing sacred Geometrical archetypy? (hence- symbolic-or 'spiritual' that which is 'incorporeal')
http://stillsearching.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/do-humans-have-souls/
^This just talks about the long standing debate of the problem of qualia..
The following excerpt seems the long standing "grounded" end question:
"But does any of this abstract philosophizing make a difference on a
practical, how-we-live-our-lives level? Perhaps. If Christians adopt physicalism
(as Murphy hopes we do), we must put a greater emphasis on the significance of
the body, and on the earthly reign of God, in which followers of Jesus
participate by active love of neighbor and in struggle for justice and peace. If
one adopts Swinburne’s hardcore dualism, our commitment to the body (which
Swinburne is reluctant to say will even exist in heaven) is undercut and our
motivation to redeem the physical all but made moot."
Showing sacred Geometrical archetypy? (hence- symbolic-or 'spiritual' that which is 'incorporeal')
http://stillsearching.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/do-humans-have-souls/
^This just talks about the long standing debate of the problem of qualia..
The following excerpt seems the long standing "grounded" end question:
"But does any of this abstract philosophizing make a difference on a
practical, how-we-live-our-lives level? Perhaps. If Christians adopt physicalism
(as Murphy hopes we do), we must put a greater emphasis on the significance of
the body, and on the earthly reign of God, in which followers of Jesus
participate by active love of neighbor and in struggle for justice and peace. If
one adopts Swinburne’s hardcore dualism, our commitment to the body (which
Swinburne is reluctant to say will even exist in heaven) is undercut and our
motivation to redeem the physical all but made moot."
1"Proof"
Firstly now you should see the idiom of "proof" as in itself being a fallacious measurement principle in the non yet detected sense. (noo cringe! i am not saying stop measuring things in science ugg, just seeing pragmatic for pragmatic O.o) Because if it cannot be detected or measured it is often quickly brushed aside as something which is not existent, erroneous or useless.
Symbolic V Pragmatic: What is "real"?:
"The idea of Lord Kelvin to describe atoms as vortex knots in ether has found its continuation in nonlinear field theories in the form of knotted, or, more generally, topological solitons" ~http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121025/srep00771/full/srep00771.html . In this i see moves toward uinderstanding 7th dimensional tunnel mathematics, this seems to be 6th dimensional geometrical creation (but its not sacred archetypy is it? because we made it it wasnt natural.. right? or have we merely stumbled upon something already existent just waiting for us.. this last question also expounds my point i like to say the future is much more attainable than a possibility, so i may turn this section into something along the lines of ;everything exists and we can even see upstream to non existent yet to be pragmatized things :O shocking! lol not everyone knows this is obvious. my whole point an case, wake up from brain wash of unsight and drilled in reductionistic realization).
It has been said; that hue-mans are creators and that we thus henceforth are able to once broken out of corporeal cagism create back up true (through) dimensionality, because in entropical normalcy we create down through the dimensions elnatural.
"hard proofs": oh u mean just one side; the very pragmatic material? haha..
i think also scalier waves may be corelative to 4th dimensional astral emotional plane, 4d is charge e-motion (energy motion)
Symbolic V Pragmatic: What is "real"?:
"The idea of Lord Kelvin to describe atoms as vortex knots in ether has found its continuation in nonlinear field theories in the form of knotted, or, more generally, topological solitons" ~http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121025/srep00771/full/srep00771.html . In this i see moves toward uinderstanding 7th dimensional tunnel mathematics, this seems to be 6th dimensional geometrical creation (but its not sacred archetypy is it? because we made it it wasnt natural.. right? or have we merely stumbled upon something already existent just waiting for us.. this last question also expounds my point i like to say the future is much more attainable than a possibility, so i may turn this section into something along the lines of ;everything exists and we can even see upstream to non existent yet to be pragmatized things :O shocking! lol not everyone knows this is obvious. my whole point an case, wake up from brain wash of unsight and drilled in reductionistic realization).
It has been said; that hue-mans are creators and that we thus henceforth are able to once broken out of corporeal cagism create back up true (through) dimensionality, because in entropical normalcy we create down through the dimensions elnatural.
"hard proofs": oh u mean just one side; the very pragmatic material? haha..
i think also scalier waves may be corelative to 4th dimensional astral emotional plane, 4d is charge e-motion (energy motion)
Neuro section: Materialist reductionsim
Spurious materialists as i call them try to purport as i would say everything to physical phenomenon the opposite of neunomenon; physical tangible explanations, all the time WHILST asserting there can be no adage "reductionism".
Such as reducing "conscious awareness" to neurscientifical correlates of the brains sensed stored electrical waves and biological occurrences. The brain which i see as a conduit not as they see it the causer. Correlates. "change your mind; change your brain" golden auraing ..
Consciousness V Awareness?: is even a V? yes appears to be a separation of distinction.
Mind V Brain?: is mind just the next highest repository? so to us is mind the GAIAN (earths) information systems? mind brain- are we 'merely' cells in earths brain.
Mind and the Mental Spheres 6.3
Such as reducing "conscious awareness" to neurscientifical correlates of the brains sensed stored electrical waves and biological occurrences. The brain which i see as a conduit not as they see it the causer. Correlates. "change your mind; change your brain" golden auraing ..
Consciousness V Awareness?: is even a V? yes appears to be a separation of distinction.
Mind V Brain?: is mind just the next highest repository? so to us is mind the GAIAN (earths) information systems? mind brain- are we 'merely' cells in earths brain.
Mind and the Mental Spheres 6.3
Quantum decay through the looking glass.
Imagine looking in the mirror and finding your familiar face reflected back as you’ve always known it. But as you look more closely, as you precisely examine that mirror image, subtle distortions emerge. The glass itself remains flawless, but real and fundamental differences exist between you and the face that lives on the other side of the looking glass.
Something similar happens in the quantum world when matter is examined against its exotic reflection: antimatter. The analogy is admittedly fanciful, but it’s no more dramatic than the dynamics of these almost-twins, which annihilate one another on contact.
http://scienceblogs.com/brookhaven/2012/03/29/quantum-decay-through-the-look/
Imagine looking in the mirror and finding your familiar face reflected back as you’ve always known it. But as you look more closely, as you precisely examine that mirror image, subtle distortions emerge. The glass itself remains flawless, but real and fundamental differences exist between you and the face that lives on the other side of the looking glass.
Something similar happens in the quantum world when matter is examined against its exotic reflection: antimatter. The analogy is admittedly fanciful, but it’s no more dramatic than the dynamics of these almost-twins, which annihilate one another on contact.
http://scienceblogs.com/brookhaven/2012/03/29/quantum-decay-through-the-look/
akasha is not aether, these r different things, im also considering aether was a word used for subatomic particles before we had "phsyical" *lol everythings energy anyway) discovered them, OR meaning post threshold (of the mercurial plane) to which we now hold a new word; neunomenous. (as apposed to phenomenous ; neunomenous of the intangible variety, so the idea behind a thing maybe is an example or the images i see in my third eye.
oh i think i used the wrong word here? mercurial i meant as mundane physical plane, rather than neunomenous. not as the google defined definition im seeing says, mercurial of the planet mercury related.
oh i think i used the wrong word here? mercurial i meant as mundane physical plane, rather than neunomenous. not as the google defined definition im seeing says, mercurial of the planet mercury related.
|
I thinkso ~ b.couwenberg
Is the 'element of aether' this 'light body' are they equivalent, because then yea soulmind seemingly overs matter.
And reality hacking is done by the soulminded individuals.
Is the 'element of aether' this 'light body' are they equivalent, because then yea soulmind seemingly overs matter.
And reality hacking is done by the soulminded individuals.
Finally a chakra picture i agree with. Colours and the extra on top 'across the threshold' one included.
Invoking the Akasha/Quintessence/Ether
1. Visualize and feel yourself in the center of an unlimited space. This will feel like floating. There is no above or below or sideways. The quintessence is ultra-violet, very similar to what is known as a black light. For those of you who are familiar with the black lights of the 1970's and how they illuminated florescent colors on posters, this is the color you should be visualizing as it is very powerful. Black lights are ultra-violet. If you are not familiar just type 'black light' into a search engine; also see 'images' of black lights; and black lightbulbs. This energy is the first step in the non-visible spectrum of light. The soul is composed of both the visible and non-visible spectrums of light.
2. Breathe in the akasha/ether, visualizing yourself completely surrounded by the ultra-violet energy as you would with energy breathing and fill your entire being with it for eleven breaths.
FEEL this energy and focus your mind and astral senses upon it.
3. Meditate on the feeling you get from invoking this energy for 10-15 minutes.
"It has been mentioned in the theoretical part that the elements originate in the akasha principle, by which they are dominated and kept in the correct balance.
After a long time of exercising, a magician who has achieved good results with the elements will also be able to control the finest principle that is the astral ether."
"We have heard that akasha is the primary source, the sphere of all causes. Any deliberate cause, such as a wish, a thought, any imagination created in this sphere together with the dynamic conviction is bound to be realized with the help of the elements, regardless of the level or sphere on which the realization necessarily has to be performed. This is one of the greatest magic mysteries and a universal key for the magician, who will understand its range only later on in the course of his development."
-Franz Bardon "Initiation into Hermetics" © 1956
Aether (classical element)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from Quintessence (alchemy))
"The aether is the fifth classical element in ancient Greek philosophy and science. This Greek concept seems to derive directly from the akasha, its Hindu counterpart. In Greek doctrines it seems that the aether was the celestial fire, the pure essence where the gods lived and which they breathed. In this connection, it seems that aether is radiative heat like that of the sun, which is able to propagate in empty space. The Greek word "aither" derives from an Indo- European root aith- ("burn, shine"). This root figures in the name of Aithiopia (Ethiopia), which means something like "burnt land."
"Aether was once believed to be a substance, which filled all of space. Aristotle included it as a fifth element (the quintessence) on the principle that nature abhorred a vacuum."
Oliver Nicholson points out that, in contrast to the better known luminiferous aether of the 19th century, the older concept of the classical aether had three properties. Among these characteristics, the classical aether had a non-material property, was "less than the vehicle of visible light", and was responsible for "generating metals" along with fostering the development of all bodies."
[1]"Robert Fludd stated that the aether was of the character that it was "subtler than light". Fludd cites the 3rd century view of Plotinus, concerning the aether as penetrative and non-material."
"[2]"Other 1800s views, such as James Clerk Maxwell, Lord Kelvin, and Nikola Tesla, was of the disposition that the aether was more akin to it actually being the electromagnetic field."
"In modern physics, dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical ether."
1. Visualize and feel yourself in the center of an unlimited space. This will feel like floating. There is no above or below or sideways. The quintessence is ultra-violet, very similar to what is known as a black light. For those of you who are familiar with the black lights of the 1970's and how they illuminated florescent colors on posters, this is the color you should be visualizing as it is very powerful. Black lights are ultra-violet. If you are not familiar just type 'black light' into a search engine; also see 'images' of black lights; and black lightbulbs. This energy is the first step in the non-visible spectrum of light. The soul is composed of both the visible and non-visible spectrums of light.
2. Breathe in the akasha/ether, visualizing yourself completely surrounded by the ultra-violet energy as you would with energy breathing and fill your entire being with it for eleven breaths.
FEEL this energy and focus your mind and astral senses upon it.
3. Meditate on the feeling you get from invoking this energy for 10-15 minutes.
"It has been mentioned in the theoretical part that the elements originate in the akasha principle, by which they are dominated and kept in the correct balance.
After a long time of exercising, a magician who has achieved good results with the elements will also be able to control the finest principle that is the astral ether."
"We have heard that akasha is the primary source, the sphere of all causes. Any deliberate cause, such as a wish, a thought, any imagination created in this sphere together with the dynamic conviction is bound to be realized with the help of the elements, regardless of the level or sphere on which the realization necessarily has to be performed. This is one of the greatest magic mysteries and a universal key for the magician, who will understand its range only later on in the course of his development."
-Franz Bardon "Initiation into Hermetics" © 1956
Aether (classical element)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from Quintessence (alchemy))
"The aether is the fifth classical element in ancient Greek philosophy and science. This Greek concept seems to derive directly from the akasha, its Hindu counterpart. In Greek doctrines it seems that the aether was the celestial fire, the pure essence where the gods lived and which they breathed. In this connection, it seems that aether is radiative heat like that of the sun, which is able to propagate in empty space. The Greek word "aither" derives from an Indo- European root aith- ("burn, shine"). This root figures in the name of Aithiopia (Ethiopia), which means something like "burnt land."
"Aether was once believed to be a substance, which filled all of space. Aristotle included it as a fifth element (the quintessence) on the principle that nature abhorred a vacuum."
Oliver Nicholson points out that, in contrast to the better known luminiferous aether of the 19th century, the older concept of the classical aether had three properties. Among these characteristics, the classical aether had a non-material property, was "less than the vehicle of visible light", and was responsible for "generating metals" along with fostering the development of all bodies."
[1]"Robert Fludd stated that the aether was of the character that it was "subtler than light". Fludd cites the 3rd century view of Plotinus, concerning the aether as penetrative and non-material."
"[2]"Other 1800s views, such as James Clerk Maxwell, Lord Kelvin, and Nikola Tesla, was of the disposition that the aether was more akin to it actually being the electromagnetic field."
"In modern physics, dark energy is sometimes called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical ether."
"Steiners medical lectures, most notably in "Fundamentals of Anthroposophical Medicine" (ISBN 0-936132-80-9) show how this same basic process is responsible for the energetic development and maintenance of the human physical body. Further investigation into his Agriculture lectures (ISBN 0-938-250-37-1) reveals he has outlined the same structure for plant growth and the energetic working of the alive soil. He goes further to suggest the four major spiritual bodies he outlines work according to this structure too. The vertical pole sees the Spirit/Ego (purple spiral) in opposition to the Physical body (red spiral). Along the horizontal plane eventually the Etheric body (green lemniscate) forms as a polarity to the Astral body (blue lemniscate). It is the harmonious working of these four bodies which ensures healthy manifestations within all kingdoms of nature. The Garuda Biodynamic Institutes task is to find ways of restoring this spiritual harmony whenever physical disharmony in nature occurs." ~~http://www.garudabd.org/node/49/
"Throughout Steiners work, he describes the activities of these bodies as manifesting according to a set of cosmic laws. These can be represented by the number of players in each law. These are commonly called the 2 fold -duality, 3 fold - physical body, 4 fold - etheric body, 7 fold - astral body and 12 fold - spirit/Ego"
DImenionality ? it is said we do create down through the dimensions, which is visualized in one manner int he diagram associated with this text: "In this picture you will note there are twelve layers from the centre of the picture (red) through to the outside purple layer. As we move away from the centre to the periphery we move up the spiral. This is imaged by the 'squiggles' which represent the activity of the body spheres as we move outwards. Another representation of this is my "Layers of Creation" diagram placed below this section."
"Throughout Steiners work, he describes the activities of these bodies as manifesting according to a set of cosmic laws. These can be represented by the number of players in each law. These are commonly called the 2 fold -duality, 3 fold - physical body, 4 fold - etheric body, 7 fold - astral body and 12 fold - spirit/Ego"
DImenionality ? it is said we do create down through the dimensions, which is visualized in one manner int he diagram associated with this text: "In this picture you will note there are twelve layers from the centre of the picture (red) through to the outside purple layer. As we move away from the centre to the periphery we move up the spiral. This is imaged by the 'squiggles' which represent the activity of the body spheres as we move outwards. Another representation of this is my "Layers of Creation" diagram placed below this section."